It is easy to speak when you are not the one losing a job or finding that at an advance age – having worked at G.M. all your life – you may not be able to get a decent job. But tough times are here to shape a better future, and letting G.M. survive with a bail out won't be the right answer.
I always had my doubts over Rick Wagoner, I found distress knowing that he always enjoyed a wide support from every employee and car dealer of G.M., meaning that everyone is to blame for the mismanagement. Just after reading an article on the New York Times from David Brooks I came to realize that he is right. Saving the big three will send the wrong message to other companies that are in trouble. After all as David puts it "are the employees of Circuit City or the newspaper industry inferior to the employees of Chrysler?."
Maybe if Ford, G.M. and Chrysler file for chapter 11 they may never recover. But that may be the right signal to send to the companies, you either have a genius like Steve Jobs on your ranks, or you may find yourself begging for money after years of incompetent management. Obama is trying to save Detroit sinking the very own foundations of the American spirit of development.
Those millions of jobs related to this companies that may be lost will put even greater pressure on the already belated job market. No matter what the outcome is the government must assure people that it will take care of workers left out with no jobs, but it will also need to make sure that stock holders and the high management team are left with nothing.
It will be painful to see one of the big three falls into bankruptcy, it may never emerge from chapter 11, but companies like Google will grow stronger trusting their entrepreneur instincts rather than bad calls that could stalled them for years. A bail out on Detroit will only mean that CEOs like Wagoner could still find a high paid job while millions of really hard working smart guys are left unemployed.
If any of the big three survives this crisis it could emerge stronger, really embracing a new technology to transform those polluting machines that we drive today. It could also mean that no matter how iconic a company may be, it knows that it is on its own to forge a stable and prosperous future because Uncle Sam won't be there to save it.
This will also mean that if the government does protect workers, they will feel comfortable working at any company even when it is facing trouble times, they will feel that the state will back them, after wiping out all the big investors money. This will show Kirk Kerkorian to better know where he puts his millions, and stock holders to see a sweet deal when it appears.
We will see what happens if by this Friday nothing really shows that Democrats will have the votes to save the car companies. G.M. does not have enough cash to make it until Obama assumes the presidency next January. So maybe before 2008 ends being the worst year in recent memory, we will find that the big three may be the small two, or the lonely one.
lunes, 17 de noviembre de 2008
jueves, 13 de noviembre de 2008
One more joke Rick!
I know, Rick can´t say that G.M. will face bankruptcy unless it gets that so needed money from the US government. Mr. Wagoner was self assuring on CNBC ´s interview with Phil LeBeau telling him that G.M. does not think about going bankrupt, the country can´t allow that to happen.
The US should not allow that to happen, that is true. When Lehman Brothers was left to the sharks the spiral of chaos unfolded much faster than anyone had anticipated. On the other hand I always thought that Mr. Wagoner was a lousy CEO. G.M. has been losing ground for several years now, it changed its big monster cars years after Toyota was enjoying a PR success called Prius.
I don´t know much about mechanics, but as a consumer I can feel the engine´s power and gas consumption, even when I do not understand the specifics. With this in mind Asian cars like Hyundai, Toyota or Honda give me the sense that they are more fuel efficient, have more power and are more comfortable. I would rather buy any of them than any of the G.M. brand.
Talks with Chrysler were fine now that we are facing recession. Talking about not getting a deal while your stock it’s at $4.36 is just stupid. If there is a lesson out of another lousy CEO like Jerry Yang is that you have to do what is best regardless of what your feelings are.
Mr. Yang rejected a $44.6 billion takeover by Microsoft back in February, instead he went to Google to cross a deal in advertising. Google backed off that deal facing possible inquiries of monopoly leaving Yahoo with a $12.2 a share as on Friday.
Microsoft´s proposal was for $31 per share, you know a bad move when you see it.
This could make G.M. a possible candidate for chapter 11, burning roughly $2.3 billion a month on Q3 it faces a huge liquidity problem as soon as January. Even with $15.2 billion in “available liquidity” it cannot risk to get to its minimum needs to get cash infusion. That is when Rick needs to run to Capitol Hill to beg for some money.
A bankrupt G.M. won´t be good for anyone being the same case as AIG. This confronts those two face phony Republicans that claim a free market wonder, just to bail out almost every big player in the American economy.
My concern does not lie on G.M.´s future, it goes to the fact that Rick Wagoner is just inept. If you hear him claim that G.M. needs around $11 to $14 billion minimum to operate and it has roughly $15.2 billion on cash liquidity, burning around $2.3 billion a month, then you now if has less than 2 more months until if goes below its minimum level.
Maybe it is time to show the exit door to Mr. Wagoner and teach an important lesson to stock holders, hey! fire the big boss before he brings down the company, do not reward him with millions of dollars on bonuses, do not give them a second chance.
To all those free market lovers, please accept the fact that free market does work but letting it be “free” could destroy the world economy as we know it. Rick Wagoner was defending that bail out of the auto industry saying that the domino effect that G.M. could cause if it goes out of business could prove devastating to the entire economy. If you are a free market pundit you may feel comfortable stating that AIG should be on chapter 11 with Lehman Brothers, Wachovia, IndyMac, Meryl Lynch, G.M., Ford, maybe Chrysler and Freddie and Fannie.
If that is the case then our current economic situation will be catastrophic, yes the world would have learn its lesson and we may waking up someday in the long future with a much stronger system, but for many years we could have suffered tremendous devastation in every corner of our economy.
When Mr. Wagoner says that in difficult times policymakers need to be ahead of the problems instead of reacting to the problems, it sound as if he never was told that the price of oil was jumping and people were looking for fuel efficient vehicles. He is talking about his own mistake for years, he is telling policymakers not to do what he did, making it sound as if he never crossed that path.
Do not react, that is a huge lesson. About 240000 jobs were lost this past month, maybe it is time for Rick Wagoner to be part of that statistic.
The US should not allow that to happen, that is true. When Lehman Brothers was left to the sharks the spiral of chaos unfolded much faster than anyone had anticipated. On the other hand I always thought that Mr. Wagoner was a lousy CEO. G.M. has been losing ground for several years now, it changed its big monster cars years after Toyota was enjoying a PR success called Prius.
I don´t know much about mechanics, but as a consumer I can feel the engine´s power and gas consumption, even when I do not understand the specifics. With this in mind Asian cars like Hyundai, Toyota or Honda give me the sense that they are more fuel efficient, have more power and are more comfortable. I would rather buy any of them than any of the G.M. brand.
Talks with Chrysler were fine now that we are facing recession. Talking about not getting a deal while your stock it’s at $4.36 is just stupid. If there is a lesson out of another lousy CEO like Jerry Yang is that you have to do what is best regardless of what your feelings are.
Mr. Yang rejected a $44.6 billion takeover by Microsoft back in February, instead he went to Google to cross a deal in advertising. Google backed off that deal facing possible inquiries of monopoly leaving Yahoo with a $12.2 a share as on Friday.
Microsoft´s proposal was for $31 per share, you know a bad move when you see it.
This could make G.M. a possible candidate for chapter 11, burning roughly $2.3 billion a month on Q3 it faces a huge liquidity problem as soon as January. Even with $15.2 billion in “available liquidity” it cannot risk to get to its minimum needs to get cash infusion. That is when Rick needs to run to Capitol Hill to beg for some money.
A bankrupt G.M. won´t be good for anyone being the same case as AIG. This confronts those two face phony Republicans that claim a free market wonder, just to bail out almost every big player in the American economy.
My concern does not lie on G.M.´s future, it goes to the fact that Rick Wagoner is just inept. If you hear him claim that G.M. needs around $11 to $14 billion minimum to operate and it has roughly $15.2 billion on cash liquidity, burning around $2.3 billion a month, then you now if has less than 2 more months until if goes below its minimum level.
Maybe it is time to show the exit door to Mr. Wagoner and teach an important lesson to stock holders, hey! fire the big boss before he brings down the company, do not reward him with millions of dollars on bonuses, do not give them a second chance.
To all those free market lovers, please accept the fact that free market does work but letting it be “free” could destroy the world economy as we know it. Rick Wagoner was defending that bail out of the auto industry saying that the domino effect that G.M. could cause if it goes out of business could prove devastating to the entire economy. If you are a free market pundit you may feel comfortable stating that AIG should be on chapter 11 with Lehman Brothers, Wachovia, IndyMac, Meryl Lynch, G.M., Ford, maybe Chrysler and Freddie and Fannie.
If that is the case then our current economic situation will be catastrophic, yes the world would have learn its lesson and we may waking up someday in the long future with a much stronger system, but for many years we could have suffered tremendous devastation in every corner of our economy.
When Mr. Wagoner says that in difficult times policymakers need to be ahead of the problems instead of reacting to the problems, it sound as if he never was told that the price of oil was jumping and people were looking for fuel efficient vehicles. He is talking about his own mistake for years, he is telling policymakers not to do what he did, making it sound as if he never crossed that path.
Do not react, that is a huge lesson. About 240000 jobs were lost this past month, maybe it is time for Rick Wagoner to be part of that statistic.
miércoles, 5 de noviembre de 2008
A New Era in Black and White
Obama is the next US President, now what?
For most of the world – as we saw on the Economist electoral vote – Obama was the right choice to be America's President. Many see an amiable America after his is sworn to the office next year. But things are tough, and so will be his presidency.
The myriad problems that the world faces are only beginning to unfold, the current crisis is reaching to untold levels of complex derivatives that government officials are trying so hard to hide. We are at a benighted stage, the future looks dim and with the price of oil going down there are two new foreign policy aspect to take into account.
First of all Obama must deal with global warming. We saw some light when oil prices were trading above $150 per barrel, now they price is below $70 meaning that people could afford to drive big guzzling cars.
Second the financial crisis is creating a plethora of opportunities for a few really wealthy people to increase even more their income, leaving the vast majority with less money to cover their basic needs.
The world seems to have acknowledged that change is needed, even with nuance upon basic proposals the broad picture is objective to the blindest. But as we all know, whatever is cheap and brings more money, is what we will buy in the end. So with prices falling down and with no signs of recovering in the near future, oil is the king again.
Although this is good for consumers, for oil exporting countries it could prove to be devastating. If low prices are the trend then Obama may have an easier time in dealing with Russia, Venezuela and Iran. Those countries facing low prices and therefore lower income will need to cut back on costly social programs.
On the first front Obama will need to push to customize subsides on alternative energy, that is until companies have enough production to cut costs and be competitive. This or taxing oil – which won't happen any time soon. The great advances on fuel efficient cars could prove inadequate under low prices at the pump. Solar panels, wind farms, research on bio fuels, all compete directly with fossil fuels, and with oil being cheaper there is no space for any other source of clean energy.
We face a world in which pundits have a hard time adjusting to a cultural reality; capitalism won't fade even when banks fall into the government's hands. An ominous challenge is to regulate without strangulating entrepreneurs, without giving too much on subsides, without risking tax payer´s money. We sure miss high oil prices for a green future, we don't when it comes to geopolitics.
This brings us to the second problem, the financial crisis and the leaders that were the apotheosis of failure are still managing the possible solutions to hinder this recession. They failed at preventing this mess, and now they think they can get the world out of it. Shame on them.
Few harbingers were accurate when smelling the whole that was being dig underneath the housing bubble that busted. Among the future tellers that weren´t is Alan Greenspan. He is still surprise that the economy did not act according to what the theory stipulates. Maybe he is mistaking macroeconomic calculus with the theory of gravity.
Obama must deal with the most severe recession since War World II mixed with rough regimes and the threat of Al Qaeda. Printing money won't get the country out of debt, it will increase its dependence on foreign “aid” just when there is no foreign money. China holds over a trillion dollars on US debt, it cannot allow the dollar to fall so it needs to keep on buying government papers. China suffers when the Fed lowers interest rates, at present time it is 1% – lower than inflation. China loses money each time that this happens.
Those tawdry international investors who win when they speculate with the ups and downs of the market, are the ones that hurt poor countries around the world. They bet against the dollar, then against the euro, then against the peso, all of this in micro deals that create a sweeping vacuum machine that suck money out of every continent.The next US President must deal with these voracious investors as he tries to calm the market and the common people that are raving against the Wall Street´s greedy. Saving Wall Street means that Main Street will suffer, but the pain won't be as bad if the government chooses to let Wall Street fall. Punishing speculators will be impossible; the first step will be to push for more regulation and more power to international entities, something that Bush and his doctrine of isolation don't want.
More regulation will only minimize the problems, we will see if the dynamic of the US economy is enough to take it out of this crisis, and later if faith on the market could make honchos invest again.
The market teeters with no clear direction or signs of prompt recovery. The dollar strengths no because its economy is getting stronger, but because the others are doing much worse. Obama must prioritize the resurge of the US with unshakable leadership. Like Sarkosy in Europe the US must lead our continent to a sole and unify policy toward this global mess. Most of our governments will take scathing measures if they react as late as usual, this will only dampen the steady growth that Latin America has enjoyed in the last years.
Obama could not allow the lacunae in our financial world to become a plight chaos of epic proportions as it swallows every dream in which we have forged our society. He must act right now by getting the best and brightest into his ranks. He must not dodge at any difficulty, if he is to become a legend, he must put the country first, even before his party´s principles.
For most of the world – as we saw on the Economist electoral vote – Obama was the right choice to be America's President. Many see an amiable America after his is sworn to the office next year. But things are tough, and so will be his presidency.
The myriad problems that the world faces are only beginning to unfold, the current crisis is reaching to untold levels of complex derivatives that government officials are trying so hard to hide. We are at a benighted stage, the future looks dim and with the price of oil going down there are two new foreign policy aspect to take into account.
First of all Obama must deal with global warming. We saw some light when oil prices were trading above $150 per barrel, now they price is below $70 meaning that people could afford to drive big guzzling cars.
Second the financial crisis is creating a plethora of opportunities for a few really wealthy people to increase even more their income, leaving the vast majority with less money to cover their basic needs.
The world seems to have acknowledged that change is needed, even with nuance upon basic proposals the broad picture is objective to the blindest. But as we all know, whatever is cheap and brings more money, is what we will buy in the end. So with prices falling down and with no signs of recovering in the near future, oil is the king again.
Although this is good for consumers, for oil exporting countries it could prove to be devastating. If low prices are the trend then Obama may have an easier time in dealing with Russia, Venezuela and Iran. Those countries facing low prices and therefore lower income will need to cut back on costly social programs.
On the first front Obama will need to push to customize subsides on alternative energy, that is until companies have enough production to cut costs and be competitive. This or taxing oil – which won't happen any time soon. The great advances on fuel efficient cars could prove inadequate under low prices at the pump. Solar panels, wind farms, research on bio fuels, all compete directly with fossil fuels, and with oil being cheaper there is no space for any other source of clean energy.
We face a world in which pundits have a hard time adjusting to a cultural reality; capitalism won't fade even when banks fall into the government's hands. An ominous challenge is to regulate without strangulating entrepreneurs, without giving too much on subsides, without risking tax payer´s money. We sure miss high oil prices for a green future, we don't when it comes to geopolitics.
This brings us to the second problem, the financial crisis and the leaders that were the apotheosis of failure are still managing the possible solutions to hinder this recession. They failed at preventing this mess, and now they think they can get the world out of it. Shame on them.
Few harbingers were accurate when smelling the whole that was being dig underneath the housing bubble that busted. Among the future tellers that weren´t is Alan Greenspan. He is still surprise that the economy did not act according to what the theory stipulates. Maybe he is mistaking macroeconomic calculus with the theory of gravity.
Obama must deal with the most severe recession since War World II mixed with rough regimes and the threat of Al Qaeda. Printing money won't get the country out of debt, it will increase its dependence on foreign “aid” just when there is no foreign money. China holds over a trillion dollars on US debt, it cannot allow the dollar to fall so it needs to keep on buying government papers. China suffers when the Fed lowers interest rates, at present time it is 1% – lower than inflation. China loses money each time that this happens.
Those tawdry international investors who win when they speculate with the ups and downs of the market, are the ones that hurt poor countries around the world. They bet against the dollar, then against the euro, then against the peso, all of this in micro deals that create a sweeping vacuum machine that suck money out of every continent.The next US President must deal with these voracious investors as he tries to calm the market and the common people that are raving against the Wall Street´s greedy. Saving Wall Street means that Main Street will suffer, but the pain won't be as bad if the government chooses to let Wall Street fall. Punishing speculators will be impossible; the first step will be to push for more regulation and more power to international entities, something that Bush and his doctrine of isolation don't want.
More regulation will only minimize the problems, we will see if the dynamic of the US economy is enough to take it out of this crisis, and later if faith on the market could make honchos invest again.
The market teeters with no clear direction or signs of prompt recovery. The dollar strengths no because its economy is getting stronger, but because the others are doing much worse. Obama must prioritize the resurge of the US with unshakable leadership. Like Sarkosy in Europe the US must lead our continent to a sole and unify policy toward this global mess. Most of our governments will take scathing measures if they react as late as usual, this will only dampen the steady growth that Latin America has enjoyed in the last years.
Obama could not allow the lacunae in our financial world to become a plight chaos of epic proportions as it swallows every dream in which we have forged our society. He must act right now by getting the best and brightest into his ranks. He must not dodge at any difficulty, if he is to become a legend, he must put the country first, even before his party´s principles.
Que Viva América!
draft-
You have to give it to the blue giant of the West. Yes they brought the financial crisis with those greedy bastards at Wall Street stealing billions of dollars, but they also gave us a huge lesson about how the future will look like.
Obama did not win the presidential election by getting 100% votes of black people, he won the election by getting, whites, blacks, Latinos, woman and Asians on his side. As you watched the crowd celebrating on Chicago you can see the diversity of the country.
Only in America could a black man with a Muslim background be elected president. Black people achieved through him the highest job on earth. It does not get any better than that, and it gives you a perspective of how the world will look like in the future.
Russia, Japan, China, India will never imagine to elect a minority leader as president, neither will a middle east country elect someone that is not Muslim, and sure enough Israel won´t have a catholic as Prime Minister.
But the US little by little is embracing its different emigrants into its main power. Now they have a black man as President and a woman as majority leader of the house. Nancy Pelosi is a tough leader who managed to succeed in a man´s only congress.
What is emerging and great about this is that Democrats being more tolerant have taken most of the seats available on the senate. They end up having a strong majority on every power seat in the country. The rest of the world may be thinking, what?
Yes the US made a lot of mistakes, mainly caused by a monochromatic party, but also by contempt to its minorities. Latinos felt abandoned by republicans, blacks no doubt about it since Katrina. A lot of changes are happening fast, the main one, America thinks green
Obama is not a black President he is a human President of the most diverse country in the world. You have to give it to America, they have done it again, they elected the most capable guy because he was most capable. As he will be sworn as the 44th President of the US next year many of the rest of the world will be thinking, is this true?
It is true, and more than that, this is the future, right now, right here. Que Viva América with all its flaws and all its achievements. Many black people were crying with joy when Obama was coming to the stage. The next leader could be a Latino, of maybe an Asian, a woman, or a regular white guy. It does not matter anymore, you truly have the chance of being something in America.
All those US haters may be left with little to cheer for, yes you hate the country but still have family there, or friends, or like a band, of the language, of their technology, sure you have doubts about the war on terror, but felt empty when the twin towers felt on that horrendous day.
It is not a matter of a new day for the US, it is something to embrace and think in the rest of countries. Unless you have the best of all cultures, of all people, you will be left as a third world country.
Every minority in the world is winning everything, from sports to elections. Take into account that we all are similar in the end. When it comes to color we prefer green, and not the kind of good green that could save the world, but the evil green that is making it disappear.
Anyways, I saw a nice picture of a pretty blond girl on top of her dad´s shoulders cheering for Obama just behind a young Latino guy. On another shot there was an Asian lady holding a camera just as a white commentator announced the latest results.
Congratulations to Obama and all that he carried on with this election. May he hold his word and have the courage to fight all the problems that the nation faces. McCain also made a special conceding speech saying that he feels that being an American is more important than any other thing. To all of us that face differences in our own countries this prove to be a life lesson, only if we unite as a nation to be better. We do not back our elected leaders, we wish them the worst, and that only mean, that we all get the worst.
You have to give it to the blue giant of the West. Yes they brought the financial crisis with those greedy bastards at Wall Street stealing billions of dollars, but they also gave us a huge lesson about how the future will look like.
Obama did not win the presidential election by getting 100% votes of black people, he won the election by getting, whites, blacks, Latinos, woman and Asians on his side. As you watched the crowd celebrating on Chicago you can see the diversity of the country.
Only in America could a black man with a Muslim background be elected president. Black people achieved through him the highest job on earth. It does not get any better than that, and it gives you a perspective of how the world will look like in the future.
Russia, Japan, China, India will never imagine to elect a minority leader as president, neither will a middle east country elect someone that is not Muslim, and sure enough Israel won´t have a catholic as Prime Minister.
But the US little by little is embracing its different emigrants into its main power. Now they have a black man as President and a woman as majority leader of the house. Nancy Pelosi is a tough leader who managed to succeed in a man´s only congress.
What is emerging and great about this is that Democrats being more tolerant have taken most of the seats available on the senate. They end up having a strong majority on every power seat in the country. The rest of the world may be thinking, what?
Yes the US made a lot of mistakes, mainly caused by a monochromatic party, but also by contempt to its minorities. Latinos felt abandoned by republicans, blacks no doubt about it since Katrina. A lot of changes are happening fast, the main one, America thinks green
Obama is not a black President he is a human President of the most diverse country in the world. You have to give it to America, they have done it again, they elected the most capable guy because he was most capable. As he will be sworn as the 44th President of the US next year many of the rest of the world will be thinking, is this true?
It is true, and more than that, this is the future, right now, right here. Que Viva América with all its flaws and all its achievements. Many black people were crying with joy when Obama was coming to the stage. The next leader could be a Latino, of maybe an Asian, a woman, or a regular white guy. It does not matter anymore, you truly have the chance of being something in America.
All those US haters may be left with little to cheer for, yes you hate the country but still have family there, or friends, or like a band, of the language, of their technology, sure you have doubts about the war on terror, but felt empty when the twin towers felt on that horrendous day.
It is not a matter of a new day for the US, it is something to embrace and think in the rest of countries. Unless you have the best of all cultures, of all people, you will be left as a third world country.
Every minority in the world is winning everything, from sports to elections. Take into account that we all are similar in the end. When it comes to color we prefer green, and not the kind of good green that could save the world, but the evil green that is making it disappear.
Anyways, I saw a nice picture of a pretty blond girl on top of her dad´s shoulders cheering for Obama just behind a young Latino guy. On another shot there was an Asian lady holding a camera just as a white commentator announced the latest results.
Congratulations to Obama and all that he carried on with this election. May he hold his word and have the courage to fight all the problems that the nation faces. McCain also made a special conceding speech saying that he feels that being an American is more important than any other thing. To all of us that face differences in our own countries this prove to be a life lesson, only if we unite as a nation to be better. We do not back our elected leaders, we wish them the worst, and that only mean, that we all get the worst.
lunes, 13 de octubre de 2008
A Former World View
If Barak Obama is to win the US election and he becomes the next US President, then the country will turn once again as the best one by a lot of measures. That he is black caused at the beginning concern among many Democrat supporters, that he was unprepared was my main concern. I still believe that if Hillary was more honest and more committed to her ideas rather than to her popularity, she would have been a terrific US President. But that is not Hillary, despite being tough and smart she is also ambiguous when it comes to policies. She tried to mingle conservatives and liberals in the same box – that is not possible.
Obama is not my favorite candidate, I don´t like his speeches and I consider Bill Clinton to be a better political figure. Obama lacks commitment to his ideas, when I see him I just don´t feel that he truly believes in a better future, he can´t enthuse the audience – nevertheless this time is anyone but McCain. But one thing that is irrelevant to me is that he is black. And that is exactly what makes this election wonderful. It has come the time when state by state is allowing gay marriage, I do not support gay marriage, but that gay people marry is irrelevant to me. I do not support abortion, but I strongly believe that the choice should be held by woman, whom should have all the tools to make the right decision. So even when I am against abortion I feel that it should not be banned, woman must be allow to have that choice, it is only up to them – and in some cases to her partners – to opt or not for that. Many conservatives on the other hand love to slouch to woman with pesky remarks about how despiteful they find abortion´s choice of “ending a life”.
There are many other issues that I am against, but I rather oppose them intellectually than support legislation that threatens to cut liberties. I did not grow up hunting so the need to hold Weirauch HW90 and chase deer is not part of my life – Sarah Palin will be shock – but it doesn´t mean that I will go around with banners pledging to restrict gun use. To the relief of the NRA.
A world that is more tolerant could be just as threatening as a world that is too conservative. Changes somehow seem to fit perfect in US politics. That a woman and a black man fought fiercely for the nomination at the most popular party in the US was good now, not 4 years ago. That gay marriage is being allowed in certain states and not in all of them is a good process now, not 10 years ago. That smarmy Republicans seem lost with their all white candidates with no woman representation is great now, not 8 years ago. Progress in certain liberties and some equal rights could not be brought all at once, that will shock the nation, that is why conservatives are always welcome to balance things.
You don´t want to see millions of bemused guys at home babysitting kids – when nature put woman in charge because they are better suit to do a greater job than man. It is a process in which woman by slow paces are working and not staying at home, or doing it after they took care of their kids until they were old enough to be left with more freedom. It is all about adapting the entire society to the new world, without creating a wave of failures that could threaten the country.
Conservatives in this new world must be consistent to the needs of the nation; if they want to strive against liberals they must embrace true values in a silky manner. They claim that a small government is needed and they run huge deficits, they want lower taxes and they cut them for the wealthy, they claim peace and they use aggressive rhetoric to run for war. People should show their backs to this type of wonky conservatism, mainly to those unprepared intellectuals that use moral authority as a way to push for a last century agenda, when the world is fast changing into a sole entity.
The new world has a US full of emigrants coming from Asia to Latin American, with various languages, different literature, cultural backgrounds that converge in new forms, mix of races that make us all look different and somehow closer. The GOP is an all white organization in a globalize world, is an old party with medieval ideas that caused the perfect storm in just 8 years in which their top representative hold the White House.
We need someone that says no to abortion, that says yes to gun rights, that opposes gay marriage, that wants to use force instead of diplomacy, that wants a tougher control on immigration. But these ideas should not be free tickets to get a free pass on terrible other ones that have nothing to do with moral views. You can feel that these concepts are profoundly wrong; you may even think that to follow this will be to highlight what you think is hubris. In the end you must admit that if there are no contra balances to liberalism it might mangle our society to the extent that it will underscore values that many have cling on to for so long.
Tax cuts on the wealthy, lower financial control over government agencies, deregulation on the market – to later end up giving $700 billion in aid – spending cuts in social areas to run huge deficits, appointing look alike people instead of prepare ones. All of this should not be compromised by the fact that we need conservatives to oppose liberal views.
All of these battles should be on the moral ground, we cannot tolerate that these issues threaten the entire world economy. Now we finally agree what I said a long time ago, Greenspan was the worst Fed chairman in history. Two bubbles under his tenure are just as bad as two recessions under George W. Bush.
A world view painted in the streets of New York was brought to its knees when no one trusted the American President and thought this was an isolated case in which Europe and Asia will not be affected.
There is no such thing as an all mighty nation that can sustain itself without having the rest of the world helping in. We learned that while Europeans claimed their system was sound, later their “sound” banks started falling off the cliff. No one can assume that their views were right about anything just about a month ago.
Things did change and were unnoticed, things surrounded us for a long time but we loath discuss them, or at least the intellectual powerful felt blinded by current events and missed the big picture.
We will emerge much different after Obama is the new US President and the war in Iraq comes finally to an end. When CEOs are forced to quit with no much compensation, when Republicans cling to their values without being idiotic about economic policies. When jingoism is a forgotten issue. The world will always look to balance itself, it will go to a middle ground, just like people always gather in big numbers, like cities are the center of an area, like big countries the center of a region. We all tend to go the “down town”, and so the world will always be there.
The old world view has no black presidents in white countries, no high ranked woman in Middle East ones, no white CEOs in Asian companies and the highfalutin attitude of leftist governments in Latin America still shines in the horizon.
The new world center is much more liberal than the past one, and the US government will be more European than the last. The new world view has not more discussions about these issues – they are settled – the new world view will talk about real problems and not about this old social transformation. We tried to muddle archaic conservatism but it will resurge much cleaner and powerful – to incite huff in many people.
As we have entered this new century we fill that the old one looks distant – passé – we can stand on Sussex Drive in Ottawa and watch people from all over the world walking indifferent of their race. All you care about is respecting the new land in which you live, all that matters is how prepare you are, how hard working you have become. You live in an accent tongue new land that somehow is more beautiful and diverse that anything seen in the past. Sadly the hapless Republican Party still lives in a white culture that is eerie of what lies ahead; their old world view is gone, they need to embrace the new world or become the minority party of the future.
Obama is not my favorite candidate, I don´t like his speeches and I consider Bill Clinton to be a better political figure. Obama lacks commitment to his ideas, when I see him I just don´t feel that he truly believes in a better future, he can´t enthuse the audience – nevertheless this time is anyone but McCain. But one thing that is irrelevant to me is that he is black. And that is exactly what makes this election wonderful. It has come the time when state by state is allowing gay marriage, I do not support gay marriage, but that gay people marry is irrelevant to me. I do not support abortion, but I strongly believe that the choice should be held by woman, whom should have all the tools to make the right decision. So even when I am against abortion I feel that it should not be banned, woman must be allow to have that choice, it is only up to them – and in some cases to her partners – to opt or not for that. Many conservatives on the other hand love to slouch to woman with pesky remarks about how despiteful they find abortion´s choice of “ending a life”.
There are many other issues that I am against, but I rather oppose them intellectually than support legislation that threatens to cut liberties. I did not grow up hunting so the need to hold Weirauch HW90 and chase deer is not part of my life – Sarah Palin will be shock – but it doesn´t mean that I will go around with banners pledging to restrict gun use. To the relief of the NRA.
A world that is more tolerant could be just as threatening as a world that is too conservative. Changes somehow seem to fit perfect in US politics. That a woman and a black man fought fiercely for the nomination at the most popular party in the US was good now, not 4 years ago. That gay marriage is being allowed in certain states and not in all of them is a good process now, not 10 years ago. That smarmy Republicans seem lost with their all white candidates with no woman representation is great now, not 8 years ago. Progress in certain liberties and some equal rights could not be brought all at once, that will shock the nation, that is why conservatives are always welcome to balance things.
You don´t want to see millions of bemused guys at home babysitting kids – when nature put woman in charge because they are better suit to do a greater job than man. It is a process in which woman by slow paces are working and not staying at home, or doing it after they took care of their kids until they were old enough to be left with more freedom. It is all about adapting the entire society to the new world, without creating a wave of failures that could threaten the country.
Conservatives in this new world must be consistent to the needs of the nation; if they want to strive against liberals they must embrace true values in a silky manner. They claim that a small government is needed and they run huge deficits, they want lower taxes and they cut them for the wealthy, they claim peace and they use aggressive rhetoric to run for war. People should show their backs to this type of wonky conservatism, mainly to those unprepared intellectuals that use moral authority as a way to push for a last century agenda, when the world is fast changing into a sole entity.
The new world has a US full of emigrants coming from Asia to Latin American, with various languages, different literature, cultural backgrounds that converge in new forms, mix of races that make us all look different and somehow closer. The GOP is an all white organization in a globalize world, is an old party with medieval ideas that caused the perfect storm in just 8 years in which their top representative hold the White House.
We need someone that says no to abortion, that says yes to gun rights, that opposes gay marriage, that wants to use force instead of diplomacy, that wants a tougher control on immigration. But these ideas should not be free tickets to get a free pass on terrible other ones that have nothing to do with moral views. You can feel that these concepts are profoundly wrong; you may even think that to follow this will be to highlight what you think is hubris. In the end you must admit that if there are no contra balances to liberalism it might mangle our society to the extent that it will underscore values that many have cling on to for so long.
Tax cuts on the wealthy, lower financial control over government agencies, deregulation on the market – to later end up giving $700 billion in aid – spending cuts in social areas to run huge deficits, appointing look alike people instead of prepare ones. All of this should not be compromised by the fact that we need conservatives to oppose liberal views.
All of these battles should be on the moral ground, we cannot tolerate that these issues threaten the entire world economy. Now we finally agree what I said a long time ago, Greenspan was the worst Fed chairman in history. Two bubbles under his tenure are just as bad as two recessions under George W. Bush.
A world view painted in the streets of New York was brought to its knees when no one trusted the American President and thought this was an isolated case in which Europe and Asia will not be affected.
There is no such thing as an all mighty nation that can sustain itself without having the rest of the world helping in. We learned that while Europeans claimed their system was sound, later their “sound” banks started falling off the cliff. No one can assume that their views were right about anything just about a month ago.
Things did change and were unnoticed, things surrounded us for a long time but we loath discuss them, or at least the intellectual powerful felt blinded by current events and missed the big picture.
We will emerge much different after Obama is the new US President and the war in Iraq comes finally to an end. When CEOs are forced to quit with no much compensation, when Republicans cling to their values without being idiotic about economic policies. When jingoism is a forgotten issue. The world will always look to balance itself, it will go to a middle ground, just like people always gather in big numbers, like cities are the center of an area, like big countries the center of a region. We all tend to go the “down town”, and so the world will always be there.
The old world view has no black presidents in white countries, no high ranked woman in Middle East ones, no white CEOs in Asian companies and the highfalutin attitude of leftist governments in Latin America still shines in the horizon.
The new world center is much more liberal than the past one, and the US government will be more European than the last. The new world view has not more discussions about these issues – they are settled – the new world view will talk about real problems and not about this old social transformation. We tried to muddle archaic conservatism but it will resurge much cleaner and powerful – to incite huff in many people.
As we have entered this new century we fill that the old one looks distant – passé – we can stand on Sussex Drive in Ottawa and watch people from all over the world walking indifferent of their race. All you care about is respecting the new land in which you live, all that matters is how prepare you are, how hard working you have become. You live in an accent tongue new land that somehow is more beautiful and diverse that anything seen in the past. Sadly the hapless Republican Party still lives in a white culture that is eerie of what lies ahead; their old world view is gone, they need to embrace the new world or become the minority party of the future.
lunes, 15 de septiembre de 2008
The Mystery of Unbroken Fears
It is sicken and comical to watch a candidate blatantly lie in front of millions with untroubled manner. This has happened before and will occur forever, until that is when the world is over.
What is troublesome is that even when they are wicked creatures who deceive for personal gain, they are just like lawyers, torturous and necessary. Like a story that is passé the old complain about politicians should come to reality. None of the prolific speech tellers are willing to rule for the common good if it interferences with his personal achievements.
But there is no other way to make things work, society is a moving entity that follows unknown patters that are God´s guess how they work. In any case, the citizen of a country is left to believe that change is always the solution for the problems that the country is facing. We know this much, everyone always offer change, that is because we never think that our country is working as good as it should be.
You may not care about a singular voting process in the middle of the world, but there is a remarkable aspect in the human sick that is best to describe.
Ecuador will go to the polls in a couple of weeks to vote for a referendum asking if the new constitution – written under the regime of Rafael Correa – should be approved. The fact that there is a voting on the constitution is pretty important – even so – it is heinous to branch it as the best we ever had. Some trouble appeared when questions rose that the text that was voted on the assembly floor was different from the one that will appear on the Yes or No voting.
Correa´s allies on the assembly admitted that the actual text have some differences from the original one, but called those mistakes of “good faith”. They parrot responses given by the President over and over until they get transformed into a well design script. This is not unique of Ecuador, most politicians will read somebody else’s speech making you thinking that they know it by rote.
Most of the process ended up as a bunk, we are still struggling to understand if the pros of the new constitution are better than the cons. Overall it seems to me that this is the least concern that we should have in our heads.
Personally I don´t trust democracy, I do feel the need of it, but we all face the mistakes done by a majority that not always takes elections as serious as they are – or to be even clearer are too dumb to think. The problem of democracy is that just like free market it will always lead to the right thing, but only after we all pay a high price.
In this particular voting process the flaws are basically the same ones that we had before. The “wise” Rafael Correa – who by the way is an economist – poor soul, talks about change, about a better future that will start as soon as the new constitution gets a Yes from the majority of voters. What is troublesome is that most of that is just talk, the fact is that you see the same old habits, only that this time he screams that he is not part of the old “policies”. Sounds familiar? Looks like someone has the same tactics that Karl Rove used for the G.O.P.
The situation is sometimes disturbing as it seems that the government flogged the constitution and then threw it to the people – some of them who barely understand that the future of the country is at stake. My response to the nay voters is that they are wasting their time making false assessment about articles in the constitution. The main problem surrounding this whole process is the process itself.
You can proclaim change when people are in woe and, lo, nothing seems to happen for better. That is a cheap strategy but it will certainly work, even more when people in distress are clinging to a leader that they see as honest and hardworking.
The resemblance of today´s division in Ecuador looks like what happened years ago in Venezuela, it puts a wanton weight over the few that acknowledge the dangers of letting the starving claim a better future. And it is not that the poor do not have the right to claim change, the problem is that it is easier for politicians to trick them. To me this is the case today.
Millions of grievous citizens are feeling the heavy investing that the government has put into infrastructure; roads have been built, schools improved, health care given. So if you are as the majority of Ecuadorians – poor – then you will be an ingrate if you voted No.
My particular position is that in some cases projects seem like profligate investments. I understand that investment is needed in poor areas as much as big buildings need to rise in big cities. What the government must do is to find balance between these parts; if you want to execute leverage you need that first. The country as a whole does not have a path to follow; we lack that distinctive get together to go to the moon theme, that open our market so we can manufacture everything that the world needs, that unite the continent so we will be stronger.
What I always grumble about is that good words written on a paper are not relevant to change, the dim future exasperate the brightest and hardest working people, they usually don´t benefit from a herd of delinquents that plague our government. Change is a cultural matter that starts with basic and unpopular measures. This will affect not only the pockets of the rich, but some benefits that the poor get. Medicine and education could not be taken away from people, and food to children should be provided by the government if necessary. Any other wickedness by the government may as well damage our free future.
We are not committed to a better future with the rest of the country, we face the same problems that Thomas L. Friedman and Paul Krugman entitle to the Bush administration for making people go out shopping instead of asking them to face the war with all the sacrifice needed. Our path is not limpid – not to the common citizens at least – it may be blight to some of us, but crystal clear to the dark Machiavellian advisors that Correa has. He appears talking from one non sequitur to another, in the end I even doubt the evidence and hope on a glimpse of light that never appears on the horizon.
We are facing a deep transformation that may start just like every other one done in the past, with flaws, corruption charges, a youth full of stoicism, personal attacks that end up on the opposition taking umbrage on Correa´s regular tasteless remarks. We hear the wail of the hunger and a hand willing to give them help. That is a strength that populist have, it is not fundamentally wrong, what complicates it is the fact that it violates the foundations of democracy and free market. Price control and other measures are not welcome in the long run, they help create black markets and distort the real output that the economy can achieve.
I don´t believe in a transcended transformation that cannot address the most underlying problems in this tumultuous times. You should not spend as if the price of oil will be over $140 a barrel forever – Ecuadorian oil prices are much lower – cause as it happens today is falling below the $100 mark. We need a fundamental transformation that focuses on what we do best and what we will do best. We have had more than enough constitutions to play with, now comes one more. Correa may have the charisma to blatantly lie without being caught, we may be so desperate to let that happened with no accountability. We sure missed another shot at creating a unique opportunity for our children. Shame on everyone that let this happen, mainly on the passive voices that watch change without knowing that change is not synonymous of better; change is just different and there are out there a millions ways to be different and get it wrong.
You can read the next constitution as much as you want, if we as a society are not willing to enforce it as we haven´t done before, we may need to make a better one in the next ten years. We are scornful citizens prompt to depression as we pull away from each other, and there are no signs of détente between the President that has polarized Ecuador – just like Chavez successfully did in Venezuela – and a weak opposition that sure can´t make their case right. Think again, this is not about a Yes or No on the ballot, it is about starting that “better” future with the wrong foot.
What is troublesome is that even when they are wicked creatures who deceive for personal gain, they are just like lawyers, torturous and necessary. Like a story that is passé the old complain about politicians should come to reality. None of the prolific speech tellers are willing to rule for the common good if it interferences with his personal achievements.
But there is no other way to make things work, society is a moving entity that follows unknown patters that are God´s guess how they work. In any case, the citizen of a country is left to believe that change is always the solution for the problems that the country is facing. We know this much, everyone always offer change, that is because we never think that our country is working as good as it should be.
You may not care about a singular voting process in the middle of the world, but there is a remarkable aspect in the human sick that is best to describe.
Ecuador will go to the polls in a couple of weeks to vote for a referendum asking if the new constitution – written under the regime of Rafael Correa – should be approved. The fact that there is a voting on the constitution is pretty important – even so – it is heinous to branch it as the best we ever had. Some trouble appeared when questions rose that the text that was voted on the assembly floor was different from the one that will appear on the Yes or No voting.
Correa´s allies on the assembly admitted that the actual text have some differences from the original one, but called those mistakes of “good faith”. They parrot responses given by the President over and over until they get transformed into a well design script. This is not unique of Ecuador, most politicians will read somebody else’s speech making you thinking that they know it by rote.
Most of the process ended up as a bunk, we are still struggling to understand if the pros of the new constitution are better than the cons. Overall it seems to me that this is the least concern that we should have in our heads.
Personally I don´t trust democracy, I do feel the need of it, but we all face the mistakes done by a majority that not always takes elections as serious as they are – or to be even clearer are too dumb to think. The problem of democracy is that just like free market it will always lead to the right thing, but only after we all pay a high price.
In this particular voting process the flaws are basically the same ones that we had before. The “wise” Rafael Correa – who by the way is an economist – poor soul, talks about change, about a better future that will start as soon as the new constitution gets a Yes from the majority of voters. What is troublesome is that most of that is just talk, the fact is that you see the same old habits, only that this time he screams that he is not part of the old “policies”. Sounds familiar? Looks like someone has the same tactics that Karl Rove used for the G.O.P.
The situation is sometimes disturbing as it seems that the government flogged the constitution and then threw it to the people – some of them who barely understand that the future of the country is at stake. My response to the nay voters is that they are wasting their time making false assessment about articles in the constitution. The main problem surrounding this whole process is the process itself.
You can proclaim change when people are in woe and, lo, nothing seems to happen for better. That is a cheap strategy but it will certainly work, even more when people in distress are clinging to a leader that they see as honest and hardworking.
The resemblance of today´s division in Ecuador looks like what happened years ago in Venezuela, it puts a wanton weight over the few that acknowledge the dangers of letting the starving claim a better future. And it is not that the poor do not have the right to claim change, the problem is that it is easier for politicians to trick them. To me this is the case today.
Millions of grievous citizens are feeling the heavy investing that the government has put into infrastructure; roads have been built, schools improved, health care given. So if you are as the majority of Ecuadorians – poor – then you will be an ingrate if you voted No.
My particular position is that in some cases projects seem like profligate investments. I understand that investment is needed in poor areas as much as big buildings need to rise in big cities. What the government must do is to find balance between these parts; if you want to execute leverage you need that first. The country as a whole does not have a path to follow; we lack that distinctive get together to go to the moon theme, that open our market so we can manufacture everything that the world needs, that unite the continent so we will be stronger.
What I always grumble about is that good words written on a paper are not relevant to change, the dim future exasperate the brightest and hardest working people, they usually don´t benefit from a herd of delinquents that plague our government. Change is a cultural matter that starts with basic and unpopular measures. This will affect not only the pockets of the rich, but some benefits that the poor get. Medicine and education could not be taken away from people, and food to children should be provided by the government if necessary. Any other wickedness by the government may as well damage our free future.
We are not committed to a better future with the rest of the country, we face the same problems that Thomas L. Friedman and Paul Krugman entitle to the Bush administration for making people go out shopping instead of asking them to face the war with all the sacrifice needed. Our path is not limpid – not to the common citizens at least – it may be blight to some of us, but crystal clear to the dark Machiavellian advisors that Correa has. He appears talking from one non sequitur to another, in the end I even doubt the evidence and hope on a glimpse of light that never appears on the horizon.
We are facing a deep transformation that may start just like every other one done in the past, with flaws, corruption charges, a youth full of stoicism, personal attacks that end up on the opposition taking umbrage on Correa´s regular tasteless remarks. We hear the wail of the hunger and a hand willing to give them help. That is a strength that populist have, it is not fundamentally wrong, what complicates it is the fact that it violates the foundations of democracy and free market. Price control and other measures are not welcome in the long run, they help create black markets and distort the real output that the economy can achieve.
I don´t believe in a transcended transformation that cannot address the most underlying problems in this tumultuous times. You should not spend as if the price of oil will be over $140 a barrel forever – Ecuadorian oil prices are much lower – cause as it happens today is falling below the $100 mark. We need a fundamental transformation that focuses on what we do best and what we will do best. We have had more than enough constitutions to play with, now comes one more. Correa may have the charisma to blatantly lie without being caught, we may be so desperate to let that happened with no accountability. We sure missed another shot at creating a unique opportunity for our children. Shame on everyone that let this happen, mainly on the passive voices that watch change without knowing that change is not synonymous of better; change is just different and there are out there a millions ways to be different and get it wrong.
You can read the next constitution as much as you want, if we as a society are not willing to enforce it as we haven´t done before, we may need to make a better one in the next ten years. We are scornful citizens prompt to depression as we pull away from each other, and there are no signs of détente between the President that has polarized Ecuador – just like Chavez successfully did in Venezuela – and a weak opposition that sure can´t make their case right. Think again, this is not about a Yes or No on the ballot, it is about starting that “better” future with the wrong foot.
lunes, 1 de septiembre de 2008
An Outstandingly Talented Candidate… that should have run against McCain
The more that I see Obama being outperformed by McCain, the more that I as struggle to understand why Democrats did not send Hillary to the final round on the presidential race.
Her marvelous speech on Tuesday night was even greater because of her grace, her positive attitude and the energized crowd that gave her a long standing ovation when she first walked in. Even Bill appeared tearful at times. As I watched Hillary performed in such unique way – to a crowd that maybe still hoped that things change before anything was official – it came to my head that Democrats may feel that they made a huge mistake sending Obama to face the tough Republicans on the main election.
Obama is nowhere near to take a huge lead over McCain, who at every point should be losing by a lot, considering that he is clueless about the economy, that he still wants to be in Iraq and the his monochromatic party has failed to embrace a multicultural country.
Obama has failed to bring that change rhetoric to a consistent action. While Hillary was tough and heroic Obama is timid and lacks that spirit to make a huge majority believe that despite his inexperience he will be a great leader.
McCain on the other hand is not the best choice for Americans. He wants to drill so more oil profits will go to his pals, but with no actual consequence to the price on the pumps. He is so jealous of Obama that even went to the extreme of placing him with Paris and Britney on the same add.
Knowing that America should not risk four more years with a Republican on the White House we can only hope that Obama wins an undeserved presidency.
Bill Clinton gave an outstanding speech on Wednesday after a four minutes or so ovation from an exited crowd. He did after Hillary a day before, what they should have so no one can tell that because of them the party lost on the general election.
Bill after all had one of the greatest eight years on the White House, opaque at times with the Monica scandal, but remembered with nostalgia after eight years of a Bush presidency that has bought more doubts than great memories.
The big night was on Thursday, although the big stadium presentation could mean a lot of problems for Obama, Democrats filled the stadium nevertheless. His speech was done to weight some confidence in the American audience. Compare to both Clinton´s speeches this particular one told me nothing new about a better future, but is generally acclaim as a great speech, where he said what was needed.
My bitter sweet feeling that Obama is the lesser of evil is more deep now that we have to tolerate a movie star for the next eight years. His character was not strong enough to beat Hillary in the primary, now it seems that he is not strong enough to beat McCain.
Now that Sarah Palin – an unknown governor from Alaska – is in the race as McCain´s choice for veep, Obama has to feel that leaving Hillary off the ticket was a dumb idea.
We may see that Joe Biden with all his experience overshadows Sarah on their debates, but woman that felt that Obama let them down may chose to support Sarah in the end. Remember that Hillary appealed to a lot of woman on the fact of just that, that woman are capable of getting to the White House, that is exactly what Palin is doing, trying to be a woman on the White House.
This can pose several problems for both campaigns, Obama risks losing the vote of thousand of Hillary supporters, most of the woman that could flunk to Sarah, also McCain can no longer attack Obama for his inexperience, as you know Sarah just got into the spotlight as she was nominated to be the Vice presidential choice two days ago.
But thinking that Palin could take most of Hillary´s votes just because of gender is not right either, what we are seeing needs to be analyze at more depth, you can take it anyway you want it, but Republicans placed a woman as Vice president candidate and that is a lot of accomplishment for a remarkable election, the US surprises the world every time that things looks bad.
If Hillary would have won the Democratic primary things will be different now. But things are the way they are and are far too complicated to understand why.
Obama does not seem like the great leader that the US needs in order to embrace the future. America was the hope and destiny of millions of entrepreneurs that saw it as the only place where they can achieve what no other place in the world could offer them. In a globalized world this is not longer the case.
Universities can bring and educate the brightest people in the world, give them the tools to be entrepreneurs, give them information, showing them a new culture. But only the government can chose to keep most of those bright students in the country. Allow them to have a job, maybe a working visa or to accept them as new citizens.
America needs a strong leader that knows that this is the future. That embraces green technologies and pushes for environmental friendly legislation. I have not heard either candidate committed neither to this nor to a hard future for this side of the planet.
We all saw the miracle of the Chinese growth, the ultra-modern airports, the slim stadium, the billions invested in infrastructure, their proud people and of all the gold medals during this past Olympics.
Obama does not seem like the right choice; Americans need someone like JFK to guide the country to the moon, someone like Reagan to achieve policy based on true beliefs. Clinton was a clear example of economic policy leaning to growth and equality.
So in this tumultuous times – just at the begging of this new millennium – when the US needs a strong leader with a clear vision of the future, voters have delivered McCain and Obama. Both candidates lack the sense of how the future will unfold all the imbalances of the current situation.
It is a shame that Obama has to be the next president, but true democracy brings to power whoever gets the most votes. Hilary knows this and pressed on a remarkable speech for everyone around her to vote for a better future. I think she knows that Obama is not the right one to change things, but McCain should not be allowed to win.
“No way, no how, no McCain”, those were Hillary´s words on her Tuesday speech. This implies that McCain must not win, even if you have to elect Obama to impede that.
We hope for the best, but it has to be set, I don’t think that Barak Obama was the right choice.
Her marvelous speech on Tuesday night was even greater because of her grace, her positive attitude and the energized crowd that gave her a long standing ovation when she first walked in. Even Bill appeared tearful at times. As I watched Hillary performed in such unique way – to a crowd that maybe still hoped that things change before anything was official – it came to my head that Democrats may feel that they made a huge mistake sending Obama to face the tough Republicans on the main election.
Obama is nowhere near to take a huge lead over McCain, who at every point should be losing by a lot, considering that he is clueless about the economy, that he still wants to be in Iraq and the his monochromatic party has failed to embrace a multicultural country.
Obama has failed to bring that change rhetoric to a consistent action. While Hillary was tough and heroic Obama is timid and lacks that spirit to make a huge majority believe that despite his inexperience he will be a great leader.
McCain on the other hand is not the best choice for Americans. He wants to drill so more oil profits will go to his pals, but with no actual consequence to the price on the pumps. He is so jealous of Obama that even went to the extreme of placing him with Paris and Britney on the same add.
Knowing that America should not risk four more years with a Republican on the White House we can only hope that Obama wins an undeserved presidency.
Bill Clinton gave an outstanding speech on Wednesday after a four minutes or so ovation from an exited crowd. He did after Hillary a day before, what they should have so no one can tell that because of them the party lost on the general election.
Bill after all had one of the greatest eight years on the White House, opaque at times with the Monica scandal, but remembered with nostalgia after eight years of a Bush presidency that has bought more doubts than great memories.
The big night was on Thursday, although the big stadium presentation could mean a lot of problems for Obama, Democrats filled the stadium nevertheless. His speech was done to weight some confidence in the American audience. Compare to both Clinton´s speeches this particular one told me nothing new about a better future, but is generally acclaim as a great speech, where he said what was needed.
My bitter sweet feeling that Obama is the lesser of evil is more deep now that we have to tolerate a movie star for the next eight years. His character was not strong enough to beat Hillary in the primary, now it seems that he is not strong enough to beat McCain.
Now that Sarah Palin – an unknown governor from Alaska – is in the race as McCain´s choice for veep, Obama has to feel that leaving Hillary off the ticket was a dumb idea.
We may see that Joe Biden with all his experience overshadows Sarah on their debates, but woman that felt that Obama let them down may chose to support Sarah in the end. Remember that Hillary appealed to a lot of woman on the fact of just that, that woman are capable of getting to the White House, that is exactly what Palin is doing, trying to be a woman on the White House.
This can pose several problems for both campaigns, Obama risks losing the vote of thousand of Hillary supporters, most of the woman that could flunk to Sarah, also McCain can no longer attack Obama for his inexperience, as you know Sarah just got into the spotlight as she was nominated to be the Vice presidential choice two days ago.
But thinking that Palin could take most of Hillary´s votes just because of gender is not right either, what we are seeing needs to be analyze at more depth, you can take it anyway you want it, but Republicans placed a woman as Vice president candidate and that is a lot of accomplishment for a remarkable election, the US surprises the world every time that things looks bad.
If Hillary would have won the Democratic primary things will be different now. But things are the way they are and are far too complicated to understand why.
Obama does not seem like the great leader that the US needs in order to embrace the future. America was the hope and destiny of millions of entrepreneurs that saw it as the only place where they can achieve what no other place in the world could offer them. In a globalized world this is not longer the case.
Universities can bring and educate the brightest people in the world, give them the tools to be entrepreneurs, give them information, showing them a new culture. But only the government can chose to keep most of those bright students in the country. Allow them to have a job, maybe a working visa or to accept them as new citizens.
America needs a strong leader that knows that this is the future. That embraces green technologies and pushes for environmental friendly legislation. I have not heard either candidate committed neither to this nor to a hard future for this side of the planet.
We all saw the miracle of the Chinese growth, the ultra-modern airports, the slim stadium, the billions invested in infrastructure, their proud people and of all the gold medals during this past Olympics.
Obama does not seem like the right choice; Americans need someone like JFK to guide the country to the moon, someone like Reagan to achieve policy based on true beliefs. Clinton was a clear example of economic policy leaning to growth and equality.
So in this tumultuous times – just at the begging of this new millennium – when the US needs a strong leader with a clear vision of the future, voters have delivered McCain and Obama. Both candidates lack the sense of how the future will unfold all the imbalances of the current situation.
It is a shame that Obama has to be the next president, but true democracy brings to power whoever gets the most votes. Hilary knows this and pressed on a remarkable speech for everyone around her to vote for a better future. I think she knows that Obama is not the right one to change things, but McCain should not be allowed to win.
“No way, no how, no McCain”, those were Hillary´s words on her Tuesday speech. This implies that McCain must not win, even if you have to elect Obama to impede that.
We hope for the best, but it has to be set, I don’t think that Barak Obama was the right choice.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)